<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anascape suing Nintendo and Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://games.techwhack.com/525-anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://games.techwhack.com/525-anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft</link>
	<description>Videogaming News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:58:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KG</title>
		<link>http://games.techwhack.com/525-anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/comment-page-1#comment-55717</link>
		<dc:creator>KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games.techwhack.com/525/anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/#comment-55717</guid>
		<description>Oh. . . and guess what??? Nintendo lost.  Time to pay up boys.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. . . and guess what??? Nintendo lost.  Time to pay up boys&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NDUDE</title>
		<link>http://games.techwhack.com/525-anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/comment-page-1#comment-55524</link>
		<dc:creator>NDUDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games.techwhack.com/525/anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/#comment-55524</guid>
		<description>Analog sensing has been out since the N64 back in 1996, and they&#039;re just suing now. I say it&#039;s just a BS publicity stunt hoping to get money off of industry giants. I hope Nintendo and Microsoft win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analog sensing has been out since the N64 back in 1996, and they&#8217;re just suing now. I say it&#8217;s just a BS publicity stunt hoping to get money off of industry giants. I hope Nintendo and Microsoft win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Locke</title>
		<link>http://games.techwhack.com/525-anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/comment-page-1#comment-55520</link>
		<dc:creator>John Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games.techwhack.com/525/anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/#comment-55520</guid>
		<description>it may be obvious before the fact but the N64 which first used analog came out a decade ago what kept them? were they hiding under a rock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may be obvious before the fact but the N64 which first used analog came out a decade ago what kept them? were they hiding under a rock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KG</title>
		<link>http://games.techwhack.com/525-anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/comment-page-1#comment-55490</link>
		<dc:creator>KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 04:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games.techwhack.com/525/anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/#comment-55490</guid>
		<description>I got a huge chuckle out of Ryan&#039;s comment regarding patnets:  it&#039;s only &quot;obvious&quot; Ryan, after it&#039;s been invented.... hahaha.... Otherwise everything would all be &quot;invented&quot; now, eh???  I hope the courts stick it to these big companies that think they can roll over these inventors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a huge chuckle out of Ryan&#8217;s comment regarding patnets:  it&#8217;s only &#8220;obvious&#8221; Ryan, after it&#8217;s been invented&#8230;. hahaha&#8230;. Otherwise everything would all be &#8220;invented&#8221; now, eh???  I hope the courts stick it to these big companies that think they can roll over these inventors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://games.techwhack.com/525-anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/comment-page-1#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games.techwhack.com/525/anascape-suing-nintendo-and-microsoft/#comment-5075</guid>
		<description>This is just insane!  Patents like these will only serve to impede progress and innovation in the video game industry.  They believe they have a claim on ANALOG controls??  Gimme a break.  Next thing you know someone will announce they have a patent on wireless controllers.  I hope the courts shut these guys down.

It&#039;s one thing to have a patent for something completely unheard of and unique and quite another to patent something obvious to anyone with half a brain.  Furthermore, if these patents are legit, I believe it is the patent holder&#039;s responsibility to either produce products using this technology or impose a small enough fee that it does not hinder new product development from companies that would use it.

How many instances has an unused patent killed a technology?  Basically, a game company would rather avoid paying licence fees so they don&#039;t use the technology and the patent holder doesn&#039;t have the assets to produce hardware / software capable of using their technology so it dies.

Patent law is sorely lacking in the field of video games.  Time to modernize the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just insane!  Patents like these will only serve to impede progress and innovation in the video game industry.  They believe they have a claim on ANALOG controls??  Gimme a break.  Next thing you know someone will announce they have a patent on wireless controllers.  I hope the courts shut these guys down.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to have a patent for something completely unheard of and unique and quite another to patent something obvious to anyone with half a brain.  Furthermore, if these patents are legit, I believe it is the patent holder&#8217;s responsibility to either produce products using this technology or impose a small enough fee that it does not hinder new product development from companies that would use it.</p>
<p>How many instances has an unused patent killed a technology?  Basically, a game company would rather avoid paying licence fees so they don&#8217;t use the technology and the patent holder doesn&#8217;t have the assets to produce hardware / software capable of using their technology so it dies.</p>
<p>Patent law is sorely lacking in the field of video games.  Time to modernize the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
